DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
Application for the Correction of
the Coast Guard Record of:
BCMR Docket No. 2005-005
FINAL DECISION
Author: Hale, D.
This is a proceeding under the provisions of section 1552 of title 10 and section
425 of title 14 of the United States Code. It was docketed on October 18, 2004, upon the
BCMR’s receipt of the applicant’s request for correction.
members who were designated to serve as the Board in this case.
This final decision, dated June 30, 2005, is signed by the three duly appointed
APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS
The applicant asked the Board to correct his military record to show that he was
awarded a Purple Heart for an injury to his right knee during his enlistment from June
26, 1941, to June 27, 1946. He alleged that he injured his right knee in 1944, when he
jumped from his landing craft into the water during an amphibious assault in the
invasion and occupation of the Eniwetok Atoll in the South Pacific. He further alleged
that several of his shipmates had to pull him out of the water and onto the beach, where
he remained until the gunfire had ceased. He did not provide a reason why he waited
nearly 60 years to seek this correction to his military record.
SUMMARY OF THE APPLICANT’S RECORDS
The applicant enlisted in the Coast Guard on June 21, 1941. After completing
training, he was assigned to the U.S.S. Arthur Middleton. The applicant’s military record
contains a detailed recording of his meritorious conduct while assigned to the U.S.S.
Arthur Middleton. The Commanding Officer (CO) of the Middleton noted with detail all
of the medals and awards the applicant had received. The CO did not mention that the
applicant had ever been injured in battle or that he was entitled to the Purple Heart.
The CO also noted the various battle campaigns in which the applicant had
participated, including the landing operations for the invasion and occupation of the
Eniwetok Atoll in February 1944.
On March 8, 1944, he was sent to the naval hospital at Pearl Harbor where he
underwent an operation to repair an internal derangement of his right knee. He
voluntarily extended his enlistment on June 26, 1944, and served in a variety of
assignments until his honorable discharge on June 27, 1946.
The applicant’s military record contains the following medical records:
• a Special Temporary Enlistment Contract dated June 26, 1941, on which it was noted
that the applicant had a 2-inch scar on the right side of his right knee and a 3-inch
scar on the right side of his left knee;
• a Report and Certificate dated June 26, 1941, signed by a physician attesting to the
applicant’s fitness for enlistment;
• a Medical History dated March 8, 1944, indicating that the applicant had injured his
right knee in 1940 (prior to enlistment) and underwent a surgical operation on
March 24, 1944, to repair the knee;
• a Final Medical Certificate dated March 20, 1944, stating that the applicant was
diagnosed and with an internal derangement of the right knee, and was being
admitted to the hospital for inpatient care;
• a Final Medical Certificate dated May 2, 1944, stating that the applicant had been
diagnosed and treated for an internal derangement of the right knee, a dislocation of
the left knee, and was discharged from outpatient treatment and was fit for duty;
• a Termination of Health Service form dated June 26, 1946, on which the applicant
indicated that during his enlistment he had undergone an operation of his right
knee.
On June 27, 1946, the applicant was honorably discharged from the Coast Guard.
At the time of his discharge, it was noted that he had earned and was entitled to wear
an American Defense Ribbon, American Area Campaign Ribbon, World War II Victory
Ribbon, Asiatic-Pacific Area Campaign Medal, Navy and Marine Corps Medal for
heroism, and the Philippine Liberation Area Campaign Ribbon. There is nothing in the
records indicating that the applicant was injured as a result of enemy action.
APPLICABLE LAW
During World War II, the Coast Guard was a part of the Navy. SECNAVINST
1650.1G states that during World War II, the Purple Heart was awarded to members of
the Armed Forces who were wounded or killed in action against an enemy of the
United States. The instruction states that “[d]uring World War I, and World War II, and
Korea [sic], an individual must have been wounded as a direct result of enemy action.
During subsequent conflicts (Vietnam and Operation Desert Storm), the individual
must have been wounded as a result of enemy action (direct or indirect).”
VIEWS OF THE COAST GUARD
On February 25, 2005, the Judge Advocate General (JAG) of the Coast Guard
submitted an advisory opinion in which he adopted the findings of the Coast Guard
Personnel Command (CGPC) in a memorandum on the case and recommended that the
Board deny the applicant’s request.
The JAG stated that there is “insufficient evidence available in the material
provided by the applicant and in his service record to overcome the presumption of
regularity afforded the government” and that the evidence did not support awarding
the applicant a Purple Heart. CGPC noted that the applicant’s injury to his right knee
was originally sustained prior to his enlistment in the Coast Guard, and while this
original injury may have been aggravated during his enlistment, there is no evidence to
directly link the medical treatment he received in March of 1944 to his participation in
the invasion of Eniwetok Atoll. CGPC also noted that there is no mention in the
applicant’s medical record of any injury sustained during military operations in 1944.
APPLICANT’S RESPONSE TO THE VIEWS OF THE COAST GUARD
On March 1, 2005, the Chair sent a copy of the views of the Coast Guard to the
applicant and invited him to respond within 30 days. No response was received.
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
The Board makes the following findings and conclusions on the basis of the
applicant's military record and submissions, the Coast Guard's submissions, and appli-
cable law:
The Board has jurisdiction concerning this matter pursuant to 10 U.S.C.
1.
§ 1552.
2.
An application to the Board must be filed within three years of the day the
applicant discovers the alleged error in his record. 10 U.S.C. § 1552(b). The applicant
was discharged in 1946 and knew or should have known that he had not received the
Purple Heart at that time. Therefore, the Board finds that the application was filed
more than 55 years after the statute of limitations expired and is untimely.
3.
Under 10 U.S.C. § 1552(b), the Board may waive the three-year statute of
limitations if it is in the interest of justice to do so. To determine whether it is in the
interest of justice to waive the statute of limitations, the Board should consider the rea-
sons for the delay and conduct a cursory review of the merits of the case. Dickson v.
Sec’y of Defense, 68 F.3d 1396 (D.D.C. 1995); Allen v. Card, 799 F. Supp. 158, 164 (D.D.C.
1992).
4.
The applicant provided no explanation for his failure to request the cor-
rection of the alleged error in his record at an earlier date.
5.
7.
The Board notes that there is insufficient evidence in the record to support
the applicant’s claim that he was wounded as a direct result of enemy action. The
record indicates that the applicant injured his knees in 1940, prior to his enlistment in
the Coast Guard in 1941, and it was noted upon his enlistment that both knees bore long
scars. The applicant alleged that he injured his right knee again when he jumped out of
his landing craft during an amphibious assault in the South Pacific in 1944. The record
does show that the applicant sought treatment for his right knee on March 8, 1944, and
eventually underwent an operation to repair his right knee and also sought treatment
for his left knee, but the applicant’s medical records do not mention that any of his knee
injuries were sustained as the direct result of enemy action. His record indicates that
his ship’s command carefully recorded the applicant’s meritorious conduct but made no
mention of any injury incurred during the invasion of Eniwetok Atoll. Accordingly, the
Board finds insufficient evidence that the applicant met the criterion for a Purple Heart
during World War II under SECNAVINST 1650.1G. to overcome the presumption of
regularity afforded the Coast Guard.
The applicant has not submitted evidence to support his claim that his
knee was injured during the invasion of the Eniwetok Atoll. If he should submit such
evidence, such as supporting statements from crewmates who knew when he was
injured, or other contemporaneous documents, the Board will reconsider his case.
Accordingly, in light of the lack of evidence supporting the applicant’s
allegation, and his failure to explain his great delay in filing his application, the Board
finds no reason to waive the statute of limitations. The applicant’s request should be
denied.
6.
[ORDER AND SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE]
ORDER
The application of __________, USCG, for correction of his military record is
denied.
Bruce D. Burkley
Raghav Kotval
Kevin M. Walker
CG | BCMR | Medals and Awards | 2008-204
This final decision, dated October 22, 2009, is approved and signed by the three duly APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant1 asked the Board to correct his military record to show that he was awarded a Purple Heart for an injury he received when his ship, the USS CAVALIER, was torpedoed by a Japanese submarine on January 30, 1945. 2007-032, in which the Board ordered the Coast Guard to review the applicant’s record to determine whether he was entitled to a Purple Heart Medal...
CG | BCMR | Medals and Awards | 2003-102
This final decision, dated February 18, 2004, is signed by the three duly appoint- APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant asked the Board to correct his military record to show that he was awarded a Purple Heart for an injury to his right index finger during his enlistment from March 13, 1945, to May 13, 1946. He pointed out that the applicant’s military record contains “very little in the way of medical records” and no evidence supporting the applicant’s allegation of injury. ...
CG | BCMR | Medals and Awards | 2009-123
APPLICABLE LAW During World War II, the Coast Guard operated as a part of the Navy. The PSC noted that the application was not timely and that the applicant “provided no justification for the over 60 year delay in filing.” Regarding the applicant’s request for a Purple Heart, the PSC stated the following: A review of the Applicant’s record does not support his entitlement to the Purple Heart Medal. Moreover, the record indicates that the applicant inquired about his medals in 1990 and did...
CG | BCMR | Discharge and Reenlistment Codes | 2007-032
The BCMR has jurisdiction of the case pursuant to section 1552 of title 10 of the of the applicant and the Coast Guard, the military record of the applicant, and applicable law. In this regard, the applicant’s military record shows the following meritorious service, conduct, and accomplishments: • On June 5, 1944, the applicant was authorized to wear the Asiatic-Pacific Area Ribbon. The Coast Guard shall correct his record to show that he received an honorable discharge.
CG | BCMR | Medals and Awards | 2009-152
of the current Medals and Awards Manual, to receive a Purple Heart, a member must incur a wound that is a direct result of any enemy action and that “required treatment by a medical authority (except in the case of a prisoner of war).” PSC stated that “there is no record of the applicant having been treated by medical authorities for combat related injuries due to an incident resulting from shrapnel or any such combat-related malady. Purple Heart Medals are awarded to members wounded as a...
CG | BCMR | Medals and Awards | 2012-125
Naval Hospital, St. Albans, New York, from 27 March 45 to 17 April 45 for psychiatric rehabilitation.” The doctors reported that he remained depressed, was unfit for duty, and should be medically discharged because “treatment under conditions of service will be difficult due to slow development of hos- tility.” They noted that he had “been informed of the Board’s findings and does not desire to submit a statement in rebuttal.” On May 9, 1945, the Commander of the 3rd Naval District issued...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011308
The applicants military records are not available to the Board for review. It was awarded in the name of the President of the United States to any member of the Armed Forces or any civilian national of the United States who, while serving under competent authority in any capacity with one of the U.S. Armed Services after 5 April 1917, died or sustained wounds as a result of hostile action. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his military records to show three bronze service stars...
CG | BCMR | Medals and Awards | 2005-031
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Application for the Correction of the Coast Guard Record of: BCMR Docket No. On December 7, 1968, the Commander of Coast Guard Activities, Vietnam, recommended that the applicant receive a Bronze Star medal for his heroic service on March 1, 1968. of the Coast Guard Medals and Awards Manual provides that “only one award of a personal military decoration will be made for the same act achievement, or period of...
CG | BCMR | Medals and Awards | 2006-004
Except in the case of a prisoner of war, the wound for which the award is made must have required treatment by a medical officer . The Board finds that if the applicant had been treated for shrapnel to the face or any other wound during this period, it is very likely such treatment would have been recorded in the applicant's military record. Therefore, due to the passage of time, the applicant’s less than compelling reasons for the 60-year delay, and the lack of sufficient evidence...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077126C070215
The applicant's military records were not available. In pertinent part, it states that the Purple Heart is awarded to any member of an Armed Force who has been wounded or killed in any action against an enemy of the United States. Army Regulation 600-8-22, also authorizes award of the European-African-Middle Eastern Campaign Medal for qualifying service in the ETO for the period 7 December 1941 to 8 November 1945.